Regulatory guide

The Digital Product Passport for textiles

What the textile DPP will require, when it is expected, and how to prepare your data now.

Published: 13 May 2026 · Last reviewed: 13 May 2026

Status of the textile DPP

The Digital Product Passport (DPP) for textiles is the EU regulatory infrastructure that will require structured, machine-readable data on textile products placed on the EU market: composition, substances of concern, environmental indicators, traceability, and repair history.1 The textile delegated act under the ESPR is expected in 2027, with mandatory implementation following a transition period of around 18 months.2

The textile delegated act under the ESPR is still being prepared. The European Commission adopted the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products and Energy Labelling Working Plan 2025-2030 in April 2025, identifying textiles (with a focus on apparel) as a priority category.2 Adoption of the textile delegated act is expected in 2027, with mandatory implementation following a transition period of around 18 months. This guide reflects the state of the proposal as of mid-2026 and will be revised as the act is finalised.

What is a Digital Product Passport

The Digital Product Passport (DPP) is a structured, machine-readable record of a product's environmental, material, and traceability information, accessible to consumers, retailers, regulators, and recyclers through a digital carrier on or with the product. The DPP is a horizontal instrument of the ESPR: Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (Articles 9 to 15), together with Annex III, establishes the general framework, and each product category is brought into scope through its own delegated act adopted under Article 4, which defines the specific data fields and access rules.1

For textiles, the DPP is intended to support several Union-level objectives: substantiating environmental claims, enabling reuse and recycling markets, supporting the Article 25 destruction ban by documenting the disposition history, and providing the data infrastructure for the broader circular economy programme.

The DPP is not a standalone regulation; it sits on top of the existing ESPR framework. Chapter III of the ESPR establishes the general DPP requirements (data content, carrier, access rights, registry, and back-up); each product-specific delegated act fills in the detail for that category.1 The textile delegated act will define what apparel and footwear must carry, in what format, at what level (model, batch, or item), and accessible to whom.

The textile delegated act and timeline

The legislative path for the textile DPP runs through several instruments. Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (the ESPR) provides the legal basis: Chapter III (Articles 9 to 15) and Annex III establish the general DPP framework, and the product categories that must carry a DPP are brought into scope through delegated acts adopted under Article 4, informed by the Working Plan.1 Annex VII of the ESPR is a separate list: it sets the scope of the Article 25 destruction ban (apparel, clothing accessories, and footwear), not the scope of the DPP.

The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products and Energy Labelling Working Plan 2025-2030, adopted by the European Commission in April 2025, identifies textiles as a priority category and sets out the indicative timeline for the textile-specific delegated act.2 The Working Plan is the Commission's roadmap, not a binding act; it signals intent and informs industry preparation.

The textile delegated act itself is in preparation by the Commission, in consultation with the Ecodesign Forum, member state competent authorities, and industry stakeholders including European apparel associations and recycling operators.3 Adoption is expected in 2027. After adoption, the act enters into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal, with a transition period before mandatory implementation. The earliest realistic date for mandatory textile DPP compliance is 2028, and it could fall later.

Two important caveats apply to this timeline. First, the roughly 18-month transition is a working assumption based on comparable delegated acts; the textile act may set a different period. Second, the act may be phased, with different effective dates for different product sub-categories depending on supply chain readiness. Brands should plan for 2028 implementation at the earliest, with the understanding that the date may move.

Expected data fields

The textile DPP is expected to carry five categories of data per product. The exact field list is being negotiated and will be locked in the final delegated act; the categories below are the working assumption based on the Working Plan, the ESPR Chapter III and Annex III framework, and the data fields already established for other ESPR categories.12

1. Material composition

The percentage breakdown of fibres in the product (cotton, polyester, elastane, wool, blends), with attention to recycled content and bio-based content. This data already exists for most brands in their PIM systems for textile labelling; the DPP will require a structured, machine-readable format rather than narrative text.

2. Substances of concern

The ESPR defines a 'substance of concern' in Article 2(27): substances of very high concern under REACH, substances with certain hazard classifications under the CLP Regulation, substances restricted under the POPs Regulation (which implements the Stockholm Convention), and substances that negatively affect the reuse or recycling of the product.1 The exact reportable list for textiles will be defined in the delegated act; documentation flows from the supply chain through declarations of conformity to the DPP.

3. Environmental indicators

Environmental performance indicators such as the carbon footprint and water footprint of the product, calculated to a defined methodology. The Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, set out in Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279, is the working assumption for the calculation framework.4 The precise indicators, calculation methodology, and verification requirements will be set in the textile delegated act.

4. Traceability

The supply chain stages with country of origin: weaving or knitting, dyeing or printing, confection. This data overlaps with the existing AGEC Article 13 disclosure and EU textile labelling rules; the DPP will require a structured format rather than free text.

5. Repair and maintenance history

The most novel data category for textiles. It includes care instructions, repair and rework events, refurbishment events, and disposition status if applicable. For brands with mature rework operations, the data feeding this field comes from the operational record of the rework workflow. For brands without a rework workflow, the field will be largely empty for new units and populated only when the product enters a repair or rework process.

Carriers: QR codes, NFC, RFID

The DPP carrier is the physical or digital mechanism by which a consumer, retailer, or regulator can access the structured data. ESPR Article 9 requires the DPP to be accessible through a data carrier and allows for different carrier types, with the data carrier on the product itself where possible; the textile delegated act will specify the acceptable options for apparel and footwear.1 Three carrier options are most likely to be permitted.

1. QR code

A 2D barcode printed on the care label, hangtag, or packaging. Scanned with a standard smartphone camera. The QR code resolves to a URL where the DPP data is served. QR is the cheapest carrier to deploy and works with existing brand infrastructure; the trade-off is durability (printed labels degrade over wash cycles).

2. NFC chip

A short-range wireless tag embedded in the garment or hangtag. Read with an NFC-enabled smartphone. NFC is more durable than printed QR for in-garment placement and supports more sophisticated interactions (the chip can carry minimal data locally and resolve to fuller data online). Cost per unit is higher; the technology is more mature in luxury and footwear than in mass-market apparel.

3. RFID

Used widely in apparel logistics already, but the DPP context likely favours NFC over RFID at the consumer level because NFC is readable by consumer devices. RFID may have a role at the supply chain and retail level rather than at consumer access.

The brand's choice of carrier will depend on price tier, in-garment placement options, durability requirements, and existing labelling infrastructure. Many brands are expected to deploy QR codes initially with NFC migration over time.

The EU DPP registry

The DPP data does not live solely with the brand. Under Article 13 of the ESPR, the European Commission was required to establish a central digital registry by 19 July 2026; the registry opened to users on 20 July 2026.17 Each DPP must be registered in it. The brand publishes the DPP data to a server it controls or a service it contracts; the carrier (QR or NFC) resolves to the brand's data; the registry holds, at a minimum, the unique registration identifier of the product, providing the persistent reference even if the brand changes hosting providers. Customs authorities use the registry to verify products at the EU border.

The registry is established under Article 13; its operational details, including the format of the unique registration identifier, are set by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778, which entered into force on 6 August 2026.7 The registry should not be confused with DPP service providers: those are the independent third-party operators that host DPP data and the mandatory back-up copy under Article 11. The Commission has run a separate call for evidence on the rules for DPP service providers.3 The registry holds identifiers and references; the DPP data itself lives with the brand or its service provider.

For brands, the practical implications are: the unique identifier must follow recognised standards (the GS1 Digital Link standard is widely expected to be central to textile DPP implementation); the data must be persistently hostable and updatable for the period set in the delegated act, including after insolvency, liquidation, or cessation of activity; and the registry is the regulator's index for compliance checks. Brands that lose their DPP hosting infrastructure or fail to maintain it will be discoverable through the registry, and the Article 11 back-up obligation exists precisely to keep the data available if a provider fails.

How the DPP relates to existing regimes

The textile DPP will not replace existing disclosure obligations; it will augment them. Three regimes coexist with the future DPP.

Existing regimeWhat it coversRelationship to DPP
ESPR Article 24 disclosureAnnual brand-level disclosure of unsold product destruction; the standardised Annex I format under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/2 applies to products discarded in financial years starting on or after 2 March 20276Shares underlying operational data; Article 24 reports brand-level aggregates, the DPP reports product-level data
AGEC Article 13 (France)Product-level environmental disclosure with QR-code access, in force in France under Decree 2022-7485The DPP is broader in scope and depth; AGEC remains in force, with the two regimes overlapping heavily and expected to converge over time
REACH and textile labellingSubstance-of-concern and material-composition data (in force)The DPP will reference these data rather than duplicate them

The pattern across all three regimes is consistent: unit-level traceability of products from manufacture through disposition is becoming the default. The DPP is the data-aggregation layer that pulls existing obligations into a single accessible record. Brands that build the operational data layer for Article 24 will have most of what the DPP requires for traceability and repair history.

How to prepare for the DPP today

Brands cannot implement the DPP before the delegated act is final, but they can build the data infrastructure the DPP will require. The work is largely the same work as preparing for ESPR Article 24 and complying with AGEC Article 13; the DPP layers on top.

1. Prepare the PIM

Product data needs to be in a structured, machine-readable format at the unit or SKU level. Material composition, country of origin per manufacturing stage, care instructions, and substance-of-concern attestations should live in the PIM with structured fields, not free text. Brands with mature PIMs are largely there; brands relying on spreadsheets and product datasheets will need to consolidate.

2. Build the operational data layer for rework

Repair and maintenance history is the most novel DPP data category. It requires unit-level identification at intake, time-stamped status changes through the rework workflow, and structured disposition records. This is the same operational layer that produces Article 24 disclosure; the rework lifecycle data flows back into the product record to populate the DPP's repair history field.

3. Choose a DPP service partner

The DPP data must be hosted persistently with a stable URL and an API for the central registry to resolve. ESPR Article 11 also requires a back-up copy of the DPP to be held by an independent third-party DPP service provider, so a purely in-house hosting model is not sufficient on its own.1 Several service vendors are building DPP-specific products, and PIM and PLM vendors are adding DPP modules; brands should pilot with a small product line before committing to a strategic vendor.

4. Run a small product pilot

The European Commission has signalled openness to industry pilots ahead of mandatory implementation. A brand piloting a DPP on a limited product line in 2026 or 2027 will be substantially further forward than a brand starting at mandatory implementation.

How Flexireo feeds the DPP repair history

Flexireo was co-developed over two years with a multinational sporting goods brand, processing more than 50,000 products through the platform. The operational data captured for rework coordination feeds directly into the DPP's repair and maintenance history field.

Every rework, refurbishment, and repair event is captured with unit-level identifier, timestamp, operator, and supporting evidence. The same data that produces the ESPR Article 24 disclosure populates the DPP's repair history. For brands integrating Flexireo with a PIM or DPP service partner, the rework lifecycle data flows back into the product record as the DPP is built.

Flexireo does not produce the full DPP. The platform's role is the operational layer for rework and disposition data; the PIM and DPP service handle the other DPP fields (composition, substances, environmental indicators, traceability of original manufacture). The DPP for textiles will be a multi-system data aggregation; Flexireo provides one of the inputs.

For brands running a DPP pilot before mandatory implementation, a first Flexireo pilot project can be implemented in one week and starts producing the repair history data immediately.

Digital Product Passport frequently asked questions

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

What is a Digital Product Passport?

A Digital Product Passport (DPP) is a structured, machine-readable record of a product's environmental, material, and traceability information, accessible through a digital carrier on or with the product. The DPP framework is established by Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (the ESPR), Articles 9 to 15, together with Annex III; each product category receives its own delegated act, adopted under Article 4, defining the specific data fields and access rules.1 For textiles, the delegated act is in preparation.

When will the DPP for textiles become mandatory?

The textile delegated act under the ESPR is expected for adoption in 2027. After adoption, a transition period (around 18 months, based on comparable delegated acts) precedes mandatory implementation. The earliest realistic date for mandatory textile DPP compliance is 2028, and it could fall later. The act may include phased implementation for different product subcategories.2

What data will the textile DPP carry?

The expected categories are material composition, substances of concern, environmental indicators (such as carbon and water footprint), traceability of manufacturing stages with country of origin, and repair and maintenance history. The exact field list will be locked in the final delegated act and may differ from the working assumption.1

What is the EU DPP registry?

The EU DPP registry is the central digital registry established by the European Commission under Article 13 of the ESPR. It opened to users on 20 July 2026.7 It holds, at a minimum, the unique registration identifier that links a physical product to its digital record, and customs authorities use it to verify products at the EU border. The registry does not hold the DPP data itself; the data lives with the brand or its DPP service provider. Its operational details are set by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778, in force since 6 August 2026.

How will the DPP be accessed?

Through a digital carrier on or with the product, typically a QR code on the care label or hangtag, or an NFC chip embedded in the garment. ESPR Article 9 requires the DPP to be accessible through a data carrier; the carrier resolves to a location where the DPP data is served.1 The textile delegated act will specify the acceptable carrier types; the working assumption is QR and NFC, with possible RFID for supply chain and retail use.

How does the DPP relate to ESPR Article 24?

Article 24 is the annual brand-level disclosure of unsold product destruction. The DPP is the product-level data record. The two regimes share underlying operational data (unit-level traceability, disposition history) but produce different artefacts. A brand that builds the operational data layer for Article 24 disclosure will have most of what the DPP requires for traceability and repair history.

What can brands do today to prepare for the DPP?

Three preparation steps are not blocked by the unfinalised delegated act: consolidate product data in a structured PIM with machine-readable fields; build the operational data layer for rework and disposition (which produces the DPP repair history field); and pilot DPP service partners or PIM modules on a small product line. Brands piloting in 2026 or 2027 will be substantially further forward at mandatory implementation.

Will the DPP apply to brands outside the EU?

Yes. The trigger for the obligation is placement on the EU market, not the brand's location. A US, UK, or Asian brand selling apparel into any EU member state will be subject to the textile DPP when mandatory implementation begins. The data infrastructure must be in place at the EU market entry point, typically the brand's EU subsidiary or its authorised representative.

How does the DPP balance transparency with commercial confidentiality?

The DPP framework allows for tiered access rights, set out in Article 10 of the ESPR and specified per category in the delegated act.1 Public-facing data (visible to anyone who scans the carrier) is expected to cover what consumers and recyclers need: composition, care instructions, recycled content, environmental indicators, and repair history. Restricted data (visible to regulators and select authorised parties only) may include more detailed supply chain traceability. The textile delegated act will specify which fields are public and which are restricted.

Build the DPP repair history layer now

Book a 30-minute demo and we will show you how the operational data layer for rework, which Flexireo provides today, feeds the DPP's repair and maintenance history when mandatory implementation arrives. The platform that runs your rework today is the platform that produces the DPP data tomorrow.

Sources

Primary sources cited inline above. Links open in a new tab.

Disclaimer. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The textile delegated act under the ESPR is in preparation; data fields, carriers, registry specifications, and timelines described on this page are working assumptions and may differ from the final delegated act. Readers should consult the primary sources linked above and seek qualified legal advice before relying on any statement on this page. Page published 13 May 2026; last reviewed 13 May 2026.